The controversy surrounding compliance startup Delve has gone from unhealthy to worse this week. Among the many recent allegations from the nameless whistleblower referred to as DeepDelver is the claim that Delve allegedly took an open supply software and handed it off as its personal work with out correct license attribution to or financial settlement with the unique developer.
The story goes that the Delve group pitched a no-code software it referred to as Pathways to a prospect. That prospect would later develop into the whistleblower DeepDelver. DeepDelver acknowledged that Pathways appeared quite a bit like Sim.ai’s open supply agent-building product referred to as SimStudio and requested Delve if it was primarily based on SimStudio. The Delve of us mentioned they constructed it themselves, the whistleblower contends.
DeepDelver then offered alleged proof that this software was really a fork — a modified copy — of SimStudio, modified simply sufficient to be handed off as Delve’s personal. If that proves true, it could be a violation of the Apache software program license, which requires the unique developer be credited.
DeepDelver calls this “stealing mental property,” which is a little bit of a stretch, since open supply instruments are freely obtainable for use, if they’re correctly credited. However the irony is tough to overlook: Delve, a startup that purports to promote a compliance resolution, might have violated a software program license.
Sim.ai’s founder and CEO, Emir Karabeg, confirmed to TechCrunch that he answered DeepDelver’s questions concerning the allegations. He advised the whistleblower that Delve had no license settlement with Sim.ai in any way.
“We knew they deliberate to make use of Sim for one thing and later tried unsuccessfully to promote them an settlement,” Karabeg advised DeepDelver. “I didn’t notice they had been going to promote it out of the field as a stand-alone resolution.”
Including to the awkwardness: Sim.ai was really a Delve buyer, Karabeg advised TechCrunch. Each startups had been grads of the startup accelerator Y Combinator, and Y Combinator alumni often purchase one another’s merchandise. So whereas Sim.ai paid Delve, Delve didn’t do the identical for Sim.ai.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
Karabeg had even expressed sympathy for Delve after the whistleblower dropped the primary bombshell final week. DeepDelver initially alleged that Delve was faking buyer information and utilizing rubber-stamping auditors, allegations that Delve has denied.
Since studying of the Sim.ai allegations, Karabeg has not heard from Delve’s founders. “I used to be consoling my pals at Delve after the primary submit was launched final week, however since I came upon about this information we haven’t been in touch,” he advised TechCrunch.
Delve’s alleged strategies preceded its Collection A funding spherical led by Perception Companions, the whistleblower additionally alleges. We’ve reached out to Perception Companions to ask about this, and concerning the venerable VC agency’s due-diligence course of.
We all know that Perception Companions’ 2025 weblog submit about why it led a $32 million funding into Delve was, for a short while, unavailable on the VC agency’s web site. The agency’s LinkedIn post concerning the funding has not been restored, not less than presently.
Mentions of the Pathways software on Delve’s web site, together with many different pages, additionally appear to have been scrubbed. Delve didn’t reply to a request for remark, and the media inquiries tackle on its web site now not works.
The allegations that Delve might have violated an open supply license of a buyer and, apparently, a buddy generated a lot outcry on X that it has develop into a trending subject, full with a scathing community note.
