David Sacks’ function as President Donald Trump’s synthetic intelligence and crypto czar might work out very properly for his investments, in addition to his associates, according to a new report The New York Times.
Nonetheless, Sacks fired back in a post on X, wherein he described a five-month reporting course of wherein accusations had been “debunked intimately.”
“At the moment they evidently simply threw up their arms and printed this nothing burger,” Sacks mentioned. “Anybody who reads the story fastidiously can see that they strung collectively a bunch of anecdotes that don’t assist the headline.”
This isn’t the primary time critics have recommended that there could also be conflicts of curiosity between Sacks’ political function and his investments. For instance, Senator Elizabeth Warren — a Democrat from Massachusetts — said earlier this year that Sacks “concurrently leads a agency invested in crypto whereas guiding the nation’s crypto coverage,” an “express battle of curiosity” that may “usually” be prohibited beneath federal regulation.
However the NYT’s story (beneath the headline “Silicon Valley’s Man within the White Home is Benefiting Himself and His Buddies,” and credited to 5 bylined reporters) appears to supply a extra complete view, with an evaluation of his monetary disclosures suggesting that amongst Sacks’ 708 tech investments, 449 are AI corporations that would profit from the insurance policies he helps.
Sacks has acquired two White Home ethics waivers declaring he would promote most of his crypto and AI belongings. Nonetheless, the NYT mentioned his public ethics filings don’t disclose the remaining worth of his crypto and AI investments, nor do they are saying when he bought off the belongings he divested.
Kathleen Clark, a Washington College regulation professor specializing in authorities ethics, made comparable factors in July after reviewing Sacks’ crypto waiver, telling TechCrunch, “That is graft.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
The NYT additionally mentioned that Sacks’ filings classify tons of of investments as {hardware} or software program, fairly than AI, whereas the businesses pitch themselves as AI companies of their advertising and marketing.
For example Sacks’ “intertwined pursuits,” the NYT pointed to the White Home summit in July the place Trump unveiled his AI roadmap — White Home chief of workers Susie Wiles reportedly stepped in to stop the All-In podcast (which Sacks co-hosts) from being the one host of the occasion. And All-In requested potential sponsors to pay $1 million for entry to a personal reception and different occasions, the NYT claimed.
The NYT additionally reported that Sacks grew to become near Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang this spring and has performed a job in eradicating restrictions on Nvidia chip gross sales world wide, together with in China.
Proper-wing media character and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon (who’s made no secret of his animosity in direction of a few of Trump’s Silicon Valley allies) mentioned Sacks is emblematic of an administration the place “the tech bros are uncontrolled.”
Sacks’ spokesperson Jessica Hoffman informed the NYT that “this battle of curiosity narrative is fake.” Hoffman mentioned Sacks has complied with the principles for particular authorities workers, that the Workplace of Authorities Ethics decided which investments he needed to promote, and that his function within the authorities has value him, fairly than benefited him.
White Home spokesperson Liz Huston mentioned Sacks has been “a useful asset for President Trump’s agenda of cementing American expertise dominance.”
Sacks’ publish responding to the NYT features a letter written to the newspaper from Clare Locke, a regulation agency that Sacks employed, claiming that the reporters had been given “clear marching orders: discover and report on a battle of curiosity between Mr. Sacks’ duties within the White Home and his background within the non-public expertise sector.”
The letter additionally addresses among the specifics of the NYT story, together with the All-In podcast’s function within the White Home AI occasion. Sacks’ attorneys mentioned the AI summit was a not-for-profit occasion, and that the All-In podcast “misplaced cash internet hosting the occasion.”
“Two sponsors had been introduced on to assist partially defray the price of the occasion, for which they acquired nothing however emblem placements,” the letter mentioned. “No entry to President Trump was ever provided, and no VIP reception ever passed off.”
