In a newly launched deposition filed in Elon Musk’s case in opposition to OpenAI, the tech govt attacked OpenAI’s security file, claiming that his firm, xAI, higher prioritizes security. He went as far as to say that “No one has dedicated suicide due to Grok, however apparently they’ve due to ChatGPT.”
The remark got here up in a line of questioning a few public letter Musk signed in March 2023. In it, he known as on AI labs to pause growth of AI methods extra highly effective than GPT-4, OpenAI’s flagship mannequin on the time, for at the very least six months. The letter, which was signed by over 1,100 folks, together with many AI consultants, acknowledged there was not sufficient planning and administration going down at AI labs, as they have been locked in an “out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever extra highly effective digital minds that nobody – not even their creators – can perceive, predict, or reliably management.”
These fears have since gained credibility. OpenAI now faces a series of lawsuits alleging that ChatGPT’s manipulative dialog techniques have led a number of folks to expertise destructive psychological well being results, with some dying by suicide. Musk’s remark means that these incidents might be used as fodder in his case in opposition to OpenAI.
The transcript of Musk’s video testimony, which occurred again in September, was filed publicly this week, forward of the anticipated jury trial subsequent month.
The lawsuit in opposition to OpenAI facilities on the corporate’s shift from a nonprofit AI analysis lab to a for-profit firm, which Musk claims violated its founding agreements. As a part of his arguments, Musk claims that AI security might be compromised by OpenAI’s industrial relationships, as such relationships would place velocity, scale, and income above security issues.
Since that recording, xAI has confronted security issues of its personal, nevertheless. Final month, Musk’s social community X was flooded with non-consensual nude photos generated by xAI’s Grok, a few of which have been mentioned to be of minors. This led the California Legal professional Normal’s workplace to open an investigation into the matter. The EU can be running its own investigation, and different governments have taken motion, too, with some imposing blocks and bans.
Within the newly filed deposition, Musk claimed he had signed the AI security letter as a result of “it appeared like a good suggestion,” not as a result of he had simply included an AI firm seeking to compete with OpenAI.
“I signed it, as many individuals did, to induce warning with AI growth,” Musk mentioned. “I simply needed to — AI security to be prioritized.” …
Musk additionally responded to different questions within the deposition, together with these about synthetic basic intelligence, or AGI — the idea of AI that may match or surpass human reasoning throughout a broad vary of duties — saying “it has a danger.” He additionally confirmed that he “was mistaken” about his supposed $100 million donation to OpenAI; the second amended complaint within the case places the precise determine nearer to $44.8 million.
He additionally recalled why OpenAI was based, which, from his perspective, was as a result of he was “more and more involved concerning the hazard of Google being a monopoly in AI,” including that his conversations with Google co-founder Larry Web page have been “alarming, in that he didn’t appear to be taking AI security significantly.” OpenAI was shaped as a counterweight to that risk, Musk claimed.
