Indian state Karnataka, house to the tech hub of Bengaluru, plans to ban youngsters underneath 16 from utilizing social media, becoming a member of a rising international motion that goals to curb younger individuals’s entry to on-line platforms regardless of questions over enforcement and effectiveness.
Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah introduced the choice in the course of the state’s price range speech on Friday. “To stop the antagonistic results on youngsters from using cellphones, using social media might be prohibited for youngsters underneath the age of 16,” he said. He didn’t share particulars on how the restrictions could be enforced.
The Karnataka state authorities didn’t maintain a session on the ban earlier than this announcement, two sources at separate tech firms advised TechCrunch.
Governments the world over have been shifting to limit youngsters’s entry to social media following years of considerations over how platforms like TikTok, Fb, Snapchat, and Instagram have an effect on younger customers and susceptible individuals. Australia turned the primary nation to ban social media for youngsters final December, and a slew of different international locations are pursuing related plans.
Indonesia mentioned on Friday it might prohibit entry to “high-risk platforms” similar to YouTube, TikTok, Fb, Instagram, Threads, X, and Roblox for customers underneath 16. Malaysia has additionally signaled it’s inspecting related measures.
The talk has been gaining traction on the nationwide degree in India, with officers in Indian states Goa and Andhra Pradesh lately saying they’re finding out related restrictions. In December, the Madras Excessive Courtroom urged the federal authorities to contemplate Australia-style restrictions on youngsters’s social media use, and a month later, India’s chief financial adviser V. Anantha Nageswaran proposed age-based limits on entry to social media platforms he described as “predatory.”
A spokesperson for Meta advised TechCrunch that the corporate helps measures that give dad and mom higher management over youngsters’ app utilization, however cautioned in opposition to broad social media bans.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
“Governments contemplating bans must be cautious to not push teenagers towards much less secure, unregulated websites, or logged-out experiences that bypass vital protections — just like the default safeguards we provide in Instagram’s Teen Accounts,” the spokesperson mentioned.
Meta mentioned it might adjust to bans the place they’re enforced, however argued that since youngsters use round 40 apps per week on common, restrictions focusing on solely a handful of platforms wouldn’t essentially enhance security.
Authorized consultants questioned whether or not an Indian state has the authority to implement such restrictions. Aparajita Bharti, founding associate at tech and public coverage consulting agency The Quantum Hub, mentioned the announcement seems to be extra of a press release of intent than a concrete coverage proposal.
“It’s unclear whether or not the Karnataka state authorities has the legislative authority to undertake such measures,” Bharti advised TechCrunch. She added that policymakers ought to contemplate India’s distinctive challenges — similar to shared machine utilization and the digital divide — fairly than “blindly comply with” fashions adopted in Western international locations.
She added that the Australian ban’s effectiveness stays unsure, and broader approaches to on-line security could also be wanted.
Kazim Rizvi, founding director of New Delhi-based suppose tank The Dialogue, mentioned broad laws regarding web insurance policies fall largely underneath India’s federal jurisdiction, doubtlessly limiting the flexibility of particular person states to impose such bans.
“A state can actually articulate the coverage goal of kid security, however a binding, platform-facing ban could be a lot tougher for a state to maintain by itself with out operating into Centre-State and constitutional questions,” he mentioned.
Digital rights advocates have raised considerations about blanket restrictions on youngsters’s entry to social media. Responding to the Karnataka authorities’s proposal, the Web Freedom Basis said such measures elevate questions on enforcement and will require age-verification techniques that create new privateness dangers for customers.
The group additionally warned that broad bans threat proscribing youngsters’s entry to info and expression, and doubtlessly deepen India’s digital gender divide if households use such measures to maintain women offline.
“Little one security on-line calls for critical, evidence-based coverage, not headline-driven prohibitions,” the group mentioned.
India’s IT ministry and the Karnataka chief minister’s workplace didn’t reply to requests for touch upon the proposal. Google, Snap, and X additionally didn’t reply to requests for remark.
