Nvidia’s GTC convention had every part: trillion greenback gross sales projections, graphics expertise that may yassify video games, grand declarations that each firm wants an OpenClaw technique, and even a robotic model of the beloved snowman Olaf from Disney’s “Frozen.”
On the most recent episode of TechCrunch’s Fairness podcast, TechCrunch’s Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I recapped CEO Jensen Huang’s keynote and debated what it means for Nvidia’s future. And sure, a giant a part of our dialogue targeted on poor Olaf, whose microphone needed to be turned off when he began rambling.
Even when the demo had gone flawlessly, Sean may nonetheless have had some reservations, as he famous these shows all the time give attention to “the engineering challenges” and never the “actually messy grey areas” on the social aspect.
“However what occurs when a child kicks Olaf over?” Sean requested. “After which each different child who sees Olaf get kicked or knocked over has their entire journey to Disney ruined and it ruins the model?”
Learn a preview of our dialog, edited for size and readability, beneath.
Anthony: [CEO Jensen Huang] was principally saying that each firm must have an OpenClaw technique now. I believe that’s only a very grand assertion that’s meant to be consideration grabbing; I believe it’s additionally fascinating coming at this type of transitional second for OpenClaw.
The founder has gone to OpenAI. So it’s now this open supply venture that probably can flourish and evolve past its creator, or it may languish. If corporations like Nvidia are investing rather a lot into it, then [it’s] extra possible that it’ll proceed to evolve. But it surely’ll be fascinating to see a yr from now, whether or not that appears like a prescient assertion or everybody’s like, “Open what?”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
Kirsten: Within the case of Nvidia, it prices them nothing within the grand scheme of issues to launch what they name NemoClaw, which is an open supply venture, which they constructed with the OpenClaw creator. But when they don’t do one thing, they’ve rather a lot to lose. So actually that message to me, the way in which I translated it when Jensen was like, “Each enterprise must have an OpenClaw technique,” it was, “Nvidia must have an answer or technique for enterprises, as a result of if it’s profitable, it’s one other method or one other pathway for Nvidia to be a part of quite a few different corporations.” So doing nothing is a better threat than doing one thing that doesn’t go wherever.
Sean: The actual query right here is why have we not talked about what’s clearly the top sport for Nvidia, and the factor that’s going to show it into the primary $100 trillion firm, which is an Olaf robotic.
Anthony: How may I neglect?
Kirsten: Anthony, simply go to the top of the 2 and a half hours to look at this.
So, the Olaf robotic comes out, and that is one thing that Jensen likes to do. He likes to have these demos and a few of them go higher than others. It’s also to display Nvidia’s expertise in robotics, and I don’t know if Olaf was really talking in actual time or if it was programmed — it felt a little bit programmed, or it had particular key phrases that it used.
However the best half about it’s that they needed to minimize its mic on the finish as a result of it simply began rambling and chatting with the gang. After which it went over to its little passageway and was slowly lowered. And you can see it on the video. It was nonetheless speaking, however no mic.
Sean: Now we simply want to offer this little robotic a wheelbase. And I do know the proper founder who can present it.
I imply, these demos are all the time foolish. I don’t wish to rise up on my soapbox, as a result of I do know that we’ve talked about this a little bit bit earlier this week, however this was a powerful demo up till the second the place it fell a little bit bit brief.
That is one other actually good instance, although, of [how] robotics is a extremely fascinating engineering downside and a extremely fascinating physics downside and a extremely fascinating integration downside, and all of these items, however this was offered as, in partnership with Disney, and it’s alleged to be the way forward for Disney parks and issues like that: You’re going to have the ability to stroll round and see Olaf from “Frozen” and take footage of them and every part.
However these efforts by no means contemplate — or definitely don’t put entrance and heart in occasions like this — all the opposite issues you must contemplate once you roll stuff out like this. There’s a extremely good YouTuber, Defunctland, that did a really good video about this — 4 hours lengthy, not too lengthy — concerning the historical past of Disney attempting to get these sorts of robotics into their park, these automatons.
The engineering challenges are actually fascinating and it’s enjoyable to see that historical past, but it surely all the time comes again to the identical query of: Okay, however what occurs when a child kicks Olaf over? After which each different child who sees Olaf get kicked or knocked over has their entire journey to Disney ruined and it ruins the model?
There’s simply a lot on the social aspect of this. And that sounds foolish, however that is the query that we’re sort of asking about humanoid robots, too. There’s a lot hype about all this different stuff and we simply don’t actually hear as a lot dialog concerning the actually messy grey areas on the social aspect of these items, and likewise simply integrating them into individuals’s lives. We solely ever actually hear concerning the engineering challenges — which once more, are actually spectacular.
Kirsten: I’ve a counterpoint after which now we have to get to our subsequent [topic]. This can be a job creator, as a result of Olaf must have a human babysitter in Disneyland, in all probability dressed up as Elsa or one thing else. You possibly can think about that truly, what we’re doing is creating jobs [with] this engineering experiment.
