An anonymous Substack post printed this week accuses compliance startup Delve of “falsely” convincing “tons of of shoppers they have been compliant” with privateness and safety rules, doubtlessly exposing these prospects to “prison legal responsibility below HIPAA and hefty fines below GDPR.”
Delve is a Y Combinator-backed startup that final yr introduced elevating a $32 million Collection A at a $300 million valuation. (The spherical was led by Perception Companions.) On Friday, the startup tried to refute the accusations with on its blog, calling the Substack put up “deceptive” and saying it “comprises plenty of inaccurate claims.”
The Substack put up is credited to “DeepDelver,” who described themselves as working at a (now former) Delve consumer.
DeepDelver recounted receiving an electronic mail in December claiming the startup had “leaked a spreadsheet with confidential consumer reviews.” Whereas Delve CEO Karun Kaushik apparently assured prospects in a subsequent electronic mail that they have been in compliance and that no exterior occasion gained entry to delicate knowledge, DeepDelver mentioned they and different prospects had turn out to be suspicious.
“Having the shared expertise of being underwhelmed with the Delve expertise, and having the general sense that one thing fishy was happening, we determined to pool sources and examine collectively,” they wrote.
Their conclusion? That Delve “achieves its declare of being the quickest platform by producing faux proof, producing auditor conclusions on behalf of certification mills that rubber stamp reviews, and skipping main framework necessities whereas telling purchasers they’ve achieved 100% compliance.”
DeepDelver went into appreciable element about these claims, accusing the startup of offering prospects with “fabricated proof of board conferences, checks, and processes that by no means occurred,” then forcing these prospects to “select between adopting faux proof or performing principally handbook work with little actual automation or AI.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
DeepDelver additionally claimed that nearly all of Delve’s purchasers appear to have gone by way of two audit companies, Accorp and Gradient, which they described as “a part of the identical operation,” one which operates primarily in India, with solely a nominal presence in the US.
These companies, they mentioned, are simply rubber-stamping reviews that have been generated by Delve. Because of this, DeepDelver mentioned the startup “inverts” the traditional compliance construction: “By producing auditor conclusions, take a look at procedures, and last reviews earlier than any impartial evaluate happens, Delve locations itself within the function of each implementer and examiner. This isn’t a technicality. It’s a structural fraud that invalidates the whole attestation.”
Along with accusing Delve of deceptive its prospects, DeepDelver mentioned the startup helps these prospects “mislead the general public by internet hosting belief pages that include safety measures that have been by no means applied.”
As for its personal relationship with Delve, DeepDelver mentioned their firm has unpublished its belief web page and now not depends on the startup for compliance.
Delve responded to the accusations by saying it doesn’t concern compliance reviews in any respect. As a substitute, it’s an “automation platform” that ingests details about compliance, then offers auditors with entry to that data.
“Remaining reviews and opinions are issued solely by impartial, licensed auditors, not Delve,” the corporate mentioned.
Delve additionally mentioned that its prospects “can decide to work with an auditor of their selecting or decide to work with one from Delve’s community of impartial, accredited third-party audit companies.” These companies, the startup mentioned, are “established companies used broadly throughout the business, together with by different compliance platforms.”
In response to the accusation that it’s offering prospects with “faux proof,” Delve countered that it’s merely providing “templates to assist groups doc their processes in accordance with compliance necessities, as do different compliance platforms.”
“Draft templates usually are not the identical as ‘pre-filled proof,” the corporate mentioned.
Delve added that it’s “actively investigating any leaks” and is “nonetheless reviewing the Substack.”
TechCrunch despatched an electronic mail in search of further remark to the media contact handle listed on Delve’s web site; the e-mail bounced. We’ve got additionally reached out to DeepDelver for added remark.
