Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Articles Stock
    • Home
    • Technology
    • AI
    • Pages
      • About us
      • Contact us
      • Disclaimer For Articles Stock
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Articles Stock
    AI

    Science fiction writers, Comedian-Con say goodbye to AI

    Naveed AhmadBy Naveed Ahmad26/01/2026Updated:29/01/2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    techcrunch cyber books illo 3

    **The AI Uprising: Sci-Fi and Fantasy Communities Take a Stand**

    Imagine sitting in a room with a bunch of fellow writers, swapping stories and sharing ideas. The writer to your left regales you with a tale she spent hours crafting, but you can’t quite shake the feeling that it was actually the result of some AI algorithm genius. We’ve been here before, but it’s becoming a real concern in the sci-fi and fantasy communities. Last month, some major players, including the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association (SFWA) and San Diego Comic-Con, took a stance: no AI-generated content allowed.

    The SFWA dropped a bombshell in December when it announced that works created entirely by those giant language models (LLMs) weren’t eligible for the Nebula Awards. But here’s the thing: they only required authors to disclose if they’d used an LLM at any point during the writing process. Cue the backlash. The SFWA Boards backpedaled quickly, acknowledging they’d botched the messaging and hurt some feelings. A new set of rules was implemented: no AI-generated content, period.

    Enter Jason Sanford, a well-respected sci-fi author, who weighed in on the controversy in his Genre Grapevine newsletter. He’s a no-AI advocate, citing the “theft” of creative work and the fact that AI tools just aren’t that creative. But he has a point: can we set some boundaries around LLM usage? After all, AI is all around us – search engines, computer software, the works. Do we really want to disqualify writers who use AI-powered tools like grammar and spell checkers?

    Comic-Con’s art show also got a quick lesson in the perils of AI-generated art. Artists complained about being allowed to display AI-generated pieces, but not sell them. The con’s rules got updated faster than you can say “NO!” to AI art.

    Where will this lead? The rules are likely to get even stricter, and the debates will continue. Other organizations will take a stance, and we’ll all be watching to see how it plays out. For now, we can expect a lot of uncomfortable conversations about creativity, originality, and the role of AI in art.

    Naveed Ahmad

    Related Posts

    Welcome to the post-hype crypto market

    26/02/2026

    Nous Analysis Releases ‘Hermes Agent’ to Repair AI Forgetfulness with Multi-Stage Reminiscence and Devoted Distant Terminal Entry Assist

    26/02/2026

    US cybersecurity company CISA reportedly in dire form amid Trump cuts and layoffs

    26/02/2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Categories
    • AI
    Recent Comments
      Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
      © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.