Kevin Rose has a visceral rule for evaluating AI {hardware} investments: “If you happen to really feel like you need to punch somebody within the face for sporting it, you in all probability shouldn’t spend money on it.”
It’s a usually candid evaluation from the veteran investor, and one born from watching the present wave of AI {hardware} startups repeat errors he’s seen earlier than. Rose, a normal companion at True Ventures and early investor in Peloton, Ring, and Fitbit, has largely averted the AI {hardware} gold rush that’s consumed Silicon Valley. Whereas different VCs rush to fund the subsequent good glasses or AI pendant, Rose is taking a decidedly totally different strategy.
“Quite a lot of it is rather like, ‘Let’s take heed to your entire dialog,’” Rose says of the present crop of AI wearables. “And to me, that breaks loads of these social constructs that we’ve with people round privateness.”
Rose speaks from expertise. He was on the board of Oura, which now instructions 80% of the good ring market, and he’s witnessed firsthand what separates profitable wearables from failed ones. The distinction isn’t simply technical functionality; it’s emotional resonance and social acceptability.
“As an investor, you form of should not solely say, okay, cool tech, certain, however emotionally, how does it make me really feel? And the way does it make others really feel round me?” he defined on stage at TechCrunch Disrupt final week. “And for me, loads of that’s misplaced in all of the AI stuff, the place it’s simply at all times on, at all times listening, attempting to be the neatest individual within the room. And it’s simply not wholesome.”
He admits to attempting numerous AI wearables himself, together with the failed Humane AI pendant that briefly caught the world’s consideration a yr in the past. However the breaking level got here throughout an argument along with his spouse. “I used to be like, I do know I didn’t say that. And I used to be attempting to make use of it to truly win an argument,” he recalled. “That was the final time I wore that factor. You don’t want to win a battle by going again and looking out on the logs of your AI pin. That doesn’t fly.”
The vacationer use case — asking your glasses what monument you’re — isn’t ok, Rose mentioned. “We are inclined to bolt AI onto the whole lot and it’s ruining the world,” he mentioned, pointing to options like photograph apps that allow you to erase individuals from the background. “I had a buddy who erased a gate from behind him to make the image look higher. I’m like, ‘That’s your yard! Your children are gonna take a look at that and be like, ‘Didn’t we’ve a gate there?’”
Rose worries we’re in an “early days of social media” second with AI — making selections that appear innocent now however will hang-out us later. “We’re gonna look again and be like, ‘Wow, that was bizarre. We simply slapped AI on the whole lot, and thought it was a good suggestion,’ just like what occurred within the early days of social. We glance again a decade or two later, and also you’re like, ‘I want I’d have finished that otherwise.’”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
He’s experiencing these tensions firsthand along with his younger kids. Utilizing OpenAI’s video era device Sora to create movies of tiny Labradoodles, his children requested the place they might get these puppies. “I’m like, that’s probably not Dad there. How do you could have that dialog? Very awkward,” he says. His resolution, he mentioned, is treating AI like film magic, explaining that simply as actors aren’t actually flying on display, Dad’s puppies aren’t actual both.
However Rose isn’t a Luddite. He’s deeply optimistic about how AI is remodeling entrepreneurship itself, and by extension, the enterprise capital trade that funds it.
“The limitations to entry for entrepreneurs are simply shrinking with day-after-day that goes by,” Rose noticed. He recounted a colleague who had by no means used AI coding instruments earlier than constructing and deploying a whole app throughout a drive from LA to San Francisco. Six months in the past, the identical activity would have taken ten occasions as lengthy and required navigating dozens of errors.
“In three months, when [Google’s] Gemini 3 hits the market, there’s going to be zero errors or subsequent to it,” Rose predicted. “Highschool coding lessons are not coding lessons — they’re vibe coding lessons, and they’ll construct the subsequent billion-dollar enterprise launched out of some random highschool. It can occur. It’s only a matter of time.”
These developments totally change the enterprise capital equation, Rose mentioned. Entrepreneurs can now delay fundraising till they completely want it, or probably skip elevating outdoors funding altogether. “It’s actually going to alter the world of VC, and I believe for the higher,” Rose mentioned.
Many enterprise companies have responded by hiring armies of engineers—Sequoia Capital, as an example, now employs as many builders as buyers. However Rose doesn’t assume that’s the reply. As a substitute, he believes the worth proposition for VCs shifts to one thing extra basic. “On the finish of the day, the entrepreneur goes to have points that aren’t technical,” he argued. “They’re very emotional issues. And so I believe the VCs with the best EQ that may present up greatest for the founders as their long run companion — which have been with companies and aren’t hopping round, that aren’t simply fly-by-night VCs however have been round and seen these issues at scale — they’re going to be wanted.”
So what does Rose search for when making investments? He circles again to one thing Larry Web page advised him years in the past when Rose was at Google Ventures, his first institutional investing job after co-founding the social information platform Digg and earlier than becoming a member of True Ventures in 2017. “A wholesome disregard for the not possible is what’s necessary to search for.”
“We would like founders that aren’t simply sanding down the tough edges, however they’re actually swinging for the fences with large, daring concepts that everybody else says, ‘That may be a horrible thought. Why are you doing this?’” Rose mentioned. “That’s what I’m drawn to. As a result of even when it doesn’t work, we love your thoughts. We love the place you might be, and we gladly again you the second time.”
