When Nick Turley joined OpenAI in 2022 as the top of ChatGPT, he was tasked with commercializing the corporate’s analysis. He has made nice strides towards that objective, rising the product to 800 million weekly lively customers. Now Turley needs to take an excellent greater swing: remodeling ChatGPT into a brand new kind of working system stuffed with third-party apps.
I sat down with Turley this week on the outskirts of San Francisco’s Fort Mason, a former U.S. navy submit the place OpenAI held its third annual developer convention, to debate how he’s desirous about ChatGPT’s future. You’ll find a transcript of our dialog on the backside of this text.
To show ChatGPT into an working system, Turley tells me he’s drawing inspiration from net browsers. Over the past decade, browsers have emerged as a brand new type of working system — not within the literal sense like macOS or Home windows, however as a result of they’ve develop into the primary place folks work on computer systems because of quite a lot of net functions. Turley sees ChatGPT evolving in an identical means: a platform that might change how folks work together with software program.
OpenAI is reportedly growing a browser too. Turley doesn’t affirm or deny this, however he does say browsers are “actually attention-grabbing.” The corporate can also be working with Jony Ive and a staff of longtime Apple designers on a household of {hardware} gadgets. Given these efforts, it’s straightforward to see how a ChatGPT working system stuffed with apps might develop into a central part of OpenAI’s client ecosystem.
OpenAI has been chasing this concept for some time. In 2023, the corporate launched an array of “AI app retailer” efforts similar to ChatGPT plugins and the GPT Retailer. These merchandise didn’t precisely take off, however OpenAI appears to have a greater strategy this time round.
The launch of apps aligns with OpenAI’s need to show ChatGPT into an e-commerce vacation spot. Apps from Expedia, DoorDash, and Uber might result in extra transactions in ChatGPT, one thing OpenAI can now facilitate and seize a number of the income from. Having a product featured in ChatGPT could possibly be a significant supply of enterprise for each third-parties and OpenAI.
This may also be OpenAI’s most compelling pitch to builders but. Third-parties can now attain ChatGPT’s 800 million customers throughout their on a regular basis conversations. Apps are a part of ChatGPT’s core expertise, quite than in a separate retailer of widgets. Builders also can construct extra interactive experiences in ChatGPT, past simply chatbots related to their firm’s information.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Nevertheless, the enterprise of working an working system additionally comes with a number of messy issues, similar to the way to promote sure apps over others. Turley says OpenAI isn’t ruling out letting some corporations pay for his or her apps to have precedence placement in ChatGPT, however the firm is determining how to do that with out hurting the person expertise.
Third-party builders doubtless additionally need entry to ChatGPT person information. In a set of pointers, OpenAI says app developers should “collect solely the minimal information required to carry out the device’s operate,” however it’s unclear what which means in observe. Turley says OpenAI could construct out new options — similar to a partitioned reminiscence in ChatGPT — that might let customers give fine-grained information entry to builders.
One standout remark from our dialog was how Turley views ChatGPT because the “supply car” for OpenAI’s nonprofit mission: to develop and distribute synthetic normal intelligence (AGI) — extremely autonomous AI methods — in a means that advantages humanity. Some OpenAI researchers fear that the corporate’s client enterprise might overpower its nonprofit mission. However in accordance with Turley, ChatGPT is how OpenAI will distribute AGI to the lots. How’s that for a spin?
Right here’s my dialog with Nick Turley, Head of ChatGPT, which has been edited for readability and brevity. My questions are in daring, his solutions usually are not.
Maxwell Zeff: How are you desirous about ChatGPT as a platform for different corporations?
Nick Turley: I believe we’re gonna look again at ChatGPT in a pair years and really feel like the present product is within the command line period. It’s actually highly effective, however it’s missing one thing crucial, which is affordances.
Within the traditional working system world, that’s apparent. We choose going to Mac or Home windows and opening functions, versus remembering all of the instructions. It’s type of bonkers to me that we’ve scaled the product to 800 million weekly lively customers with the shape issue we now have. It is a bizarre and exhausting to develop class, and but it’s rising like loopy.
The evolution we’re attempting to make over the following few years is one the place ChatGPT itself is extra like an working system the place you possibly can come and use functions. If you wish to write, there’s an app for that. If you wish to code, there’s an app for that. If you wish to work together with items and companies, there are functions for you.
However we will’t construct the whole lot ourselves. We’re not going to have a music streaming service, or replicate Coursera’s catalog of academic supplies. We’re not going to get into the enterprise that Expedia and Reserving.com are in. And for that purpose, it is smart to companion.
There’s additionally an entire era of apps that persons are going to construct that wouldn’t have been doable beforehand. The Ubers of the world solely exist due to the cellular platform, and I’m actually enthusiastic about what these could be for ChatGPT.
We additionally wish to give builders, who’ve been with us because the starting, entry to ChatGPT’s 800 million weekly customers. In the event that they’re capable of improve ChatGPT and construct actual companies on prime of that, it creates extra winners within the ecosystem.
The place do you draw inspiration from when constructing ChatGPT?
You may’t go to at least one spot. I typically inform job candidates they should have first rules pondering, and in the event that they’re gonna attempt to run a playbook they noticed at Meta or Google, you’re truly gonna run out of opponents to repeat. With regards to [ChatGPT] or Sora, there’s simply zero precedent. So that you type of must get your analogies from totally different locations.
I believe browsers are actually attention-grabbing as a result of, in some methods, they’ve develop into the working system within the final 10 years. How many people truly use desktop apps? You would possibly use Excel or PowerPoint, however most of what we do truly occurs within the browser through application-like issues.
I additionally spent a while trying on the early advertisements for the [Apple] PowerBook. It’s type of like ChatGPT the place it was this equipment that no one fairly knew the whole lot you might do with it. The ads have been actually like “It’s a calculator, it’s an alarm clock.”
So there isn’t a single factor you possibly can take a look at, however it behooves us to study from historical past. If you happen to simply take a look at the final 10 years, there may not be the right analogous factor.
You talked about browsers and gadgets there. How are you desirous about increasing ChatGPT into these kind elements?
OpenAI is the type of place the place you dream huge. One class we now have coated is productiveness, which is successfully ChatGPT. However there are such a lot of different product classes to be constructed, they usually’re all going to vary with AI. Leisure is one, which is why I’m enthusiastic about Sora. Social media is one other one. Clearly, {hardware} and entry factors to the Web are attention-grabbing too.
It is best to actually take into consideration what we’re constructing as a household of merchandise and functions which might be tied collectively by your account, personalization, and identification layer. I’m actually excited that we’re not boxing ourselves in. Even when we have been simply the ChatGPT firm, there can be infinite issues to construct, however our ambition on what we will do for folks simply goes means past that.
I’m excited by listening to the way you assume the buyer enterprise of OpenAI suits into the nonprofit mission. I’ve heard some folks say the buyer enterprise funds the mission. How do you see it?
The OpenAI I joined was a analysis lab that may ship a demo or two. The truth is, my job description on the time was framed to me as “serving to commercialize OpenAI know-how” — very open ended. At the moment, the product existed to deliver the analysis to life so that folks truly get it. I believe that was true and nonetheless is true, as you possibly can see with Sora. One of the best ways to begin a grounded discourse on the profoundness of a know-how is to ship one thing.
Then we moved from that framing to, okay, possibly the product is greater than that. Perhaps the product is definitely the best way we fund the mission. It grew to become evident sooner or later, even earlier than I acquired to OpenAI, that that is all going to be very costly.
However after ChatGPT, we began speaking about it a bit otherwise. Our mission is to make sure that AGI advantages all of humanity, and reaches folks. If you happen to mix that with the perception that AGI might be not this single second in time, however quite a gradual factor, you must consider product because the supply car of the mission. It’s the best way you truly profit folks in observe.
If you happen to take a look at what these 800 million persons are doing each week, ChatGPT helps them obtain their targets. I don’t know when you noticed the man within the keynote who taught himself to code at 89. That’s insane to me. I discuss to ChatGPT customers who assist their autistic children by modeling social interactions. I discuss to people who find themselves solely self taught in a language primarily based on what they do with ChatGPT. Like, that’s the mission.
I don’t assume it’s honest to speak in regards to the client enterprise as a funding car. Somewhat, it’s the expression. That’s a method by which OpenAI has developed, to me at the least, since I’ve joined.
Let’s dive deeper into the apps that have been introduced at this time. OpenAI has mentioned that third-parties can solely take the “minimal quantity of information” essential to run an app in ChatGPT. How are you desirous about person privateness?
From day one, we’re going to ask builders to confide in customers what info they’re requesting. We’re additionally solely going to let [apps] go stay if they’re affordable within the information that they request. We revealed our developer pointers [at launch] so folks gained’t be shocked once we reject their app as a result of it doesn’t adjust to our stance on privateness.
Over the following month, we wish to construct methods for customers to present fine-grained entry to builders. I believe Apple has completed an outstanding job with this, the place you possibly can share information simply this time, or on a regular basis, and so forth.
To do this nicely, we’d want some idea of a partitioned reminiscence in ChatGPT, which we’re nonetheless pondering by means of. However we’re actually excited in regards to the thought since you would possibly wish to hold sure conversations, like well being, separate from others, similar to music. Customers could wish to share one, however not the opposite, with an app. So we’re going to have much more to share quickly, as a result of it’s truly a mixed analysis and engineering problem to do that nicely.
The factor that’s uncompromisable for us is transparency. We would like customers, in any respect factors, to know what information could be going to a third-party, however the controls will come over time as we construct them out.
DoorDash and Instacart are two corporations that can have apps in ChatGPT quickly sufficient. If I wish to order some snacks, how will ChatGPT know which one to go to?
That is the traditional query. One of the best ways to begin is you present them each. If you happen to’ve used one in every of them earlier than, we’ll prioritize that one. If you happen to’ve used each, we’ll ask which one you like. We might get extra subtle over time. You would think about one in every of these apps being a lot greater high quality than one other. Perhaps there can be purpose to prioritize one over the opposite.
Now we have a number of companions in the identical product classes. I believe probably the most swish and respectful strategy to deal with that’s to serve each apps.
Are you desirous about letting corporations pay for his or her apps to have preferential spot placement in ChatGPT?
This is likely one of the issues we’re hoping to do some discovery on with builders. There’s this commerce off. You would attempt to determine all of it out prematurely, and roll it out with the announcement, however that in all probability means you didn’t discuss to lots of people. Or you might delay it, which suggests everybody’s asking questions and doesn’t know precisely what’s going to occur, however it offers us the flexibility to really have interaction.
We selected the latter simply because we all know that constructing this ecosystem goes to be an extended recreation. It’s not going to occur on day one, and due to this fact it’s higher to be considerate on what kind of distribution mechanisms are and aren’t honest recreation.
On the finish of the day, we would like an ideal person expertise. So if that may result in apps [surfacing] which might be irrelevant to the person, I don’t assume we’d prefer it. If this was a lever that helped us prioritize apps which might be actually critical as a result of they’re clearly attempting to spend money on publicity, it could possibly be a very good factor. Now we have no standpoint as of at this time. It’s actually one thing that’s provide you with totally different companions.