Tesla has been hit with an enforcement motion by California’s Division of Insurance coverage (CDI) for routinely denying or delaying buyer claims regardless of years of warnings from the state regulator, in response to a new pair of filings.
Tesla’s insurance coverage arm, together with its accomplice State Nationwide Insurance coverage Firm, engaged in “willful unfair claims settlement practices” together with “egregious delays in responding to policyholder claims in all steps” of the method and “unreasonable denials,” CDI wrote. This has allegedly prompted “monetary hurt” and “misery to policyholders.”
CDI first approached Tesla about these points in 2022, in response to the filings, but it claims issues have solely gotten worse. “In 2025, the Tesla Firms have already had extra complaints, extra justified complaints, and dedicated extra violations than within the three earlier years mixed,” the regulator wrote.
Tesla and State Nationwide may face penalties as much as $5,000 for every “illegal, unfair, or misleading act” and as much as $10,000 for every “willful” act, in response to the filings. The businesses have 15 days to reply.
The enforcement motion may have knock-on authorized results for Tesla. In July, the corporate was hit with a proposed class motion lawsuit over allegations that the company purposely delayed and minimized claim payouts. CDI wrote Friday that Tesla’s actions could have created “potential third-party legal responsibility publicity.” Tesla and State Nationwide didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
Tesla launched its in-house insurance coverage product in 2019. The concept was to supply cheaper premiums and quicker service. But it surely bought off to a rocky begin. The web site repeatedly crashed, and when it didn’t, it supplied quotes that had been far higher than owners expected. Nonetheless, Musk promised it will be a “revolutionary” product.
Simply three years later, in response to CDI’s filings, the regulator observed a “marked uptick in claims-related client complaints” towards Tesla. So in December 2022, CDI began assembly with Tesla and State Nationwide.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
The regulator stated it discovered Tesla’s “Head of Claims” place had been vacant for months. It additionally accused the businesses of not reporting the claims-handling issues.
Because of this, CDI subjected Tesla and State Nationwide to a kind of probationary interval: the regulator monitored the businesses’ efforts to cut back these violations for six months. Tesla and State Nationwide “conceded” that that they had underestimated the quantity of claims and the staffing required to deal with them, in response to CDI, and promised to beef up hiring.
It took Tesla till April 2023 to rent a brand new Head of Claims. Via the remainder of that yr, Tesla and State Nationwide “reported enhancements within the high quality” of their claims dealing with and the “decision of client complaints.”
Later that yr, Reuters printed an investigation into Tesla’s insurance arm that confirmed issues weren’t so rosy.
CDI got here to the identical realization in 2024. The regulator observed a “vital improve” in each client complaints towards Tesla and “violations of the regulation,” in response to the filings. CDI had acquired simply 83 client complaints towards Tesla in 2022, however in 2024, that quantity jumped to 829. In 775 of these instances, CDI discovered Tesla had violated the state’s insurance coverage code.
Issues have solely gotten worse, in response to CDI. Via September 22 of this yr, the regulator has acquired 1,481 complaints towards Tesla, and recognized 1,969 insurance coverage code violations.
In complete, since 2022, CDI stated Tesla has amassed practically 3,000 violations of state insurance coverage regulation. The vast majority of these violations contain Tesla failing to answer clients inside the necessary 15-day interval. CDI stated it recognized 166 violations during which Tesla filed to conduct a “thorough, honest, and goal investigation” right into a declare.
“CDI repeatedly notified [Tesla] of its claims-mishandling points and violations of regulation,” the regulator wrote. “Whereas [Tesla] repeatedly dedicated to enhancements, the variety of justified complaints and violations continued to mount, demonstrating [Telsa’s] failure to right its practices.”